Showing posts with label relationships. Show all posts
Showing posts with label relationships. Show all posts

Sunday, 16 July 2023

What's Your Love Language - Relationships

Whether it's a romantic or platonic relationship, we all have specific needs and methods in which we communicate. It's not always easy to be able to decipher how to communicate with individuals especially in the workplace, at home, and/or with love interests. So here I go writing a post about what I consider to be one of the top three things someone should know before not only entering into a romantic relationship but also maintaining the familial/friendship relationships we have through life. Here we go!

First off, how can you know what to ask for from your partner/friend if you in turn don't even know what it is your wanting from that someone. Although communication is key, I feel that figuring out and knowing what your love language is ranks as one of the top three things to understand and accept before having any of your relationships come into fruition. What do I mean you ask or why is this so important? Well knowing, understanding, and accepting what you love language is with assist in sometimes the arguments/discussions had or perhaps allow you to explain to others how they can best know and love you or even assist someone in understanding where your point of view comes from - all because of your love language. I will say though that this specific post will be expanding more on the romantic relationship base. 

We all receive and provide love in different ways and according to Dr. Gray Chapman it's in five specific ways. Below is a snapshot from the special website on love languages and you can click on the image to peruse more. 

So, what are the five different ways? You have "words of affirmation, acts of service, receiving gifts, quality time, and physical touch." If you're too lazy to google more on the love languages, don't worry because we're delving into each of them for you.

  1. Words of Affirmation
    1. This love language feeds off of someones words building them up, where it's the spoken words of affection (whether through praise, compliments, encouragement, empowerment, etc.) Words of hate or words that are harsh can effect you for a long time.
  2. Acts of Service
    1. Someone who has this as their love language experiences and feels love through the selfless actions and willingness of their partners, through acts of kindness and more importantly of making their partners lives easier/less of a struggle by taking away some of their burdens. A prime example would be someone who works a long shift, but their partner knowing this, would perhaps make dinner and have the kitchen clean so when their partner arrives from their long day they are surprised by what they find, and all without having been asked/told how they could make their day easier or better. If their partner is lazy or giving broken promises, they can easily be made to feel unloved or not important.
  3. Receiving Gifts
    1. One must take note that this particular love language has no exact association to materialistic things or more precisely doesn't always relate to tangible objects all the time. It's more a defined gift that specifically makes the person happy, perhaps by someone providing their favorite drink just because or sending someone a song to let them know it reminds them of their partner. It's not about gaudy jewelry or extravagant gifts...it's about the significance behind the gift given to that person. Generic gifts or forgotten special/significant events are NOT ideal for someone with this love language. 
  4. Quality Time
    1. The easiest way to describe this love language would be...the person who has this has their love language doesn't feel loved when someone can't be actively listening or that has had  long periods or timeframes without some one-on-one time with their partner. The best thing for a partner to do for this person who experiences this love language is to always be actively present with them, not staring at their phones or distracted by anything and everything, it's a focused attention on their time together, undivided attention to them as a couple and the other as a person.
  5. Physical Touch
    1. I feel like this one is self explanatory :) BUT if you still need it written out here goes...kissing, hugs, holding hands, etc Any and all forms of physical contact are the basis of this love language for someone. Touches convey safety, love, warmth, cherished, coddled, protected, etc. When the person who has this love language experiences physical neglect, a barrier or wedge will shortly follow if not immediate.

The biggest mistake and error I believe that anyone can do when their interested in someone, dating, or freshly into a new relationship is NOT entrust/let the other person know what their love language is. i feel that it would assist in leveling the "playing field" for expectations on how the couple can nurture and express themselves to each other. So don't wait until it's too late and you're wondering whether your significant other or spouse still loves you or let those negative thoughts enter your mind with doubts about things that your assuming, all because you never relayed to the person you love/your love interest what your love language is. I mean quite frankly unless this is openly and freely divulged into the other, the other person won't take notice in how to "love you" unless you actually tell them!

For those of you who have expressed your love language and already have issues with your significant other or spouse...that means yours is a special specific situation that goes past love languages...

Sincerely,

A Distinct Woman 

Thursday, 2 February 2023

Give Back The Ring - Relationship

You may have already guessed what this post is about. You guessed it, this post involves the after or more correctly stated what I feel should happen when an engagement ends. Also none of the images are mine, they were just used after a google search "engagement ring montage". So I don't know how other females are or what their thought process is but I'm writing based off of my first hand experience and my thought process after breaking three engagements, and what occurred thereafter the broken engagement - and no I didn't keep any of the rings! As I'm writing this post I'm actually trying to go through my archived photos to see if I even have the pictures of these three beautiful rings...If I happen to find them I will make sure to update the post ;) Count on it! I digress and continue on to the main topic (not past engagement rings).

We are going to be breaking down the scenarios with the effect of the original owner/buyer of the engagement ring, rightfully keeping the ring. In order to better understand my breakdown, allow me to shed some light on my thought process. You see I believe that an engagement ring is not only a present symbol of the future promise to be made but it serves as a present symbol in the form of a "sparkling" gift to the understanding of a in the moment promise made between the couple. Whether someone spends a few hundred dollar or even thousands of dollars on the engagement ring, it remains being something symbolic to the person who purchased it; whether their hard work in purchasing something expensive for another, or the time spent in agony in choosing what they thought their loved one would like (as well as appreciate), or the shear size of the ring being the symbol of not only a financial foundation of their future but to imply a statement of ownership as well. All in all, there isn't just pressure on the person who accepts or denies the question made, but I believe there is more pressure on the person who is doing the asking. Now don't any one person misinterpret the statements I've just made, I'm not saying a males role is more important than a females role or that either party aren't taking a gamble or making a bet for the rest of their life; let me just put it to you this way, last I checked there aren't many or any women buying engagement rings for the men or doing much of the asking (even if the world claims women are doing it all). So now that you know my thought process, here we go! 

1)if you're involved with someone (no matter what the duration is) and the proposal has been made, where you receive an engagement ring because you've said yes; yes that ring is "yours" but remember it's the gift of what is to be not the guarantee. So if you mutually both agree to separate ways and call off the engagement wouldn't the most respectful/loving thing be to then return the engagement ring to its rightful owner-the one who presented it. Or how about the more conscientious thing to do if you truly cared for someone, "hey you spent so much money on this so take it back and see if there's any refund or money that you can get back." Why wouldn't you want to do to right by your partner, lover, best friend and confidant. 

2)you're involved with someone (no matter what the duration is) and the proposal has been made with the acceptance of the engagement ring. However the female who as originally accepted the ring is at a later time wanting to end the engagement and sever ties, therefore ending the relationship. Why would she have of need of the engagement ring; if she cared for the person who she was involved in a relationship with then why wouldn't she give back the ring that was presented to her. For me personally when I hear that the female keeps the ring, then she was more greedy for the "prosperous" aspect of the relationship/marriage to be, because now she's going to pawn off or reap the funds of whatever she gets from the ring. No offense to anyone but to close a chapter for the proviso relationship, you would want to get rid of the remains of it (regardless of good or bad memories) that in turn means the ring as well.

3)you're involved with someone (no matter what the duration is) and the proposal has been made with the acceptance of the engagement ring. However, the male is the one to call off the engagement and sever ties, therefore ending the relationship. I feel this is a situation where it warrants the ring to stay in the possession of the female to do as she pleases (as it was the male who presenting the ring with the proposal and is the one renegading after all that's transpired. 

4)you're involved with someone (no matter what the duration is) and the proposal has been made with the acceptance of the engagement ring, but the ring is an heirloom or family inherited jewel...some may argue on this point no matter what HOWEVER, as much as I am for evolving with the older traditions in play, when it comes to something like this a ring such as this should stay in the original family it is coming from. If that means she doesn't get it then too bad, life's full of disappointments so people should just deal with it. Actually no, more importantly if there was ever a shed of true emotions that transpired between the couple than what happens to the ring in a circumstance such as this would be an easy answer for all-that it remains with the person who presented the ring.

5)you're involved with someone (no matter what the duration is) and the proposal has been made with the acceptance of the engagement ring. If there is a circumstance involving an event of infidelity/cheating (especially when the relationship parameters are set to exclusive and monogamous) on the male then I believe it is at the discretion of the "ring bearer" (the person whose fingers the ring is worn on) what happens to the ring. Now if it's the other way around and the female cheated then, damn woman just give the man his ring so he can at least have enough money for some booze after the heartache and dent in his bank you just did him on top of cheating on him!

Everyone, obviously to each your own just please remember that regardless of broken hearts and/or mixed feelings you should: if your religious, treat others the way you would want to be treated or more importantly you wouldn't want your future son/daughter to be treated in a smilier fashion; not religious, karma is a bitch or if you want the universe to give to you positive energy that put out that same positive energy even though your engagement ended or think of one of your family members was being treated the same way-how would you react...

Sincerely,

A Distinct Woman

Thursday, 8 September 2022

Dating a Sports Guy - Relationships/General

For females reading this post, yes it can be done. Anyone who tells you otherwise hasn't come across any of the males I'll be talking about in this post. You can have a healthy and loving relationship with a male who loves or lives for sports, it can just take some getting used to or maybe after this blog post you'll be enlightened enough to try dating one of these males that you've previously written off before. For the men reading this post, please by all means correct me if I'm wrong! I love when someone provides another twist to my "story" or legitimate information to bring to the table, which in turn enlightens the public.

So in case you're wondering, yes I've dated the man who love sports, the sports fan, the sports fanatic, and the sports addict. I’m not sure if these are actual labels society uses but they’re definitely the categories or labels I've created of what I’m about elaborate on. Oh don’t you worry because there is a difference between them all. So I’ll dive in to their definitions and I’ll provide some little insight on how I've seen some things should and can work out.

The Man who loves sports - this man is energetic about attending sports events and/or playing sports and/or watching sports. Just has a genuine appreciation for the talents behind the sports. He won't care if he's with the guys doing this or with his girlfriend/significant other. His motives for sports is pleasure and won't see important life moments as an obstacle for his sports. Although it would be best to define as a couple what those "life moments" are so that he can continue to enjoy sports and not feel threatened by your involvement with him and with something that he truly enjoys in life as well.

I personally enjoyed dating this guy, because some of the dates were fun and so "let loose" without concern or pressure of having things perfect. I will openly admit that because of these two specific (different sports guys) guys I dated, helped me to better appreciate the moments in our fun sport like outings and not having a care in the world to sweat in front of someone. No I don't mean as if you're in a workout class or at the gym, I'm talking about a care-free environment where you're only concern is about what you'll both be eating together because you've enjoyed the sweat, the outing, and each other's company. When you're dating this guy just be open to the sporting outings and the fun you could have, he will enjoy you and want more time together. I know what you're wanting to ask, did I end up with him or did I severe ties? We split ways because I was focused more on my career than using up PTO time for sports.

The Sports Fan - this man is only a few notches above the "The Man who loves sports". What makes these two labels different is that the man with label concentrates his energy on the specific sport and team/s he only likes. Will keep up with the team and their stats but wont necessarily but his sports above his actual life or I should say above those "life moments". If this man is interested in you, he will also concentrate his energy in getting you exposed and involved with his team/s and sports. 

I dated one man like this and he was a nice upgrade from the first label guy. I was not only able to appreciate the moment getting into the sports with him but it was fascinating for me to hear how passionate he was about something else that I merely saw as a hobby or as a form of entertainment. Men like this will appreciate your support in what they love, will appreciate you more because you've put time into what they like, and when they really like you they will try to find a compromise with their sports as well and their time with you. To answer your question, I did not end it with this one, he's my ex-husband; for the record we didn't call it quits because of his sports!

The Sports Fanatic - this man is the medium of the labels prior and the labels after, yet can be borderline close to the "addict". He'll be so absorbed into this team/s and may even have the natural inclination to forget about you but can still be a seriously good catch. He will spout everything about his team/s and there's a good chance he will have memorabilia of his team. He will stay tuned to the stats, events, games, and season but if treated right and understood will be a great and fun loving guy. He won't miss an important "life moment" but he will make sure he's in attendance or sets aside the time for his game/s. All in all pretty tolerable, fun to be with and around, yet his quirk will most likely deter his attention away from you.

The two men I dated were everything enjoyable, spontaneous, and fun but I just couldn't get behind putting that much time and effort into the team/s because I wanted to enjoy other things. Mutual split after about four dates in. He really was a great guy though. 

The Sports Addict - let's be very frank about this man. This man is so caught up and dedicated to sports that unless he's die hard seriously intrigued/wanting to invest time into you. He will literally cancel a date on you and quite possibly (unless he seriously likes you) won't even bother rescheduling because sports season is more important than worrying about when he will or won't be seeing you. He's so caught up in the sports season that it won't matter what life events or even if you are his significant other, you are not going to trump his need to be involved in the throes of the season, sport spirit, events, and this could involve both pro as well as college sports. The sports addict will be into all aspects of sports-lives and breathes it. Might be there for the birth of his child as long as there was sports onesies involved for the baby, but seriously he'll be one heck of a piece of work. Some might find it annoying or obnoxious, and others who have been involved or who know men like this, know that this is their vice/quirk/special trait/non-negotiable, whatever you want to think.

I found that dating this type of male requires a very special character and personality in a female. It's not that you can't be happy dating or being in a relationship with this person, it just means that if you're not used to being this involved in sports (and I don't mean just playing softball/soccer or whatever sport in high school and/or college but either trying to be pro or missed the opportunity to be a pro) you won't be able to fully appreciate or understand him. If you think dating a man like this with the intent to "change him" or perhaps "change his mannerism in sports" to put you first in his life completely, even over his addiction for sports-you're clearly delusional and going about it in the wrong manner. This man will appreciate the woman who gives him space for his "addiction" and will reciprocate in kind to the woman he's chosen to be involved with. Yes I dated one male like this. I'm not like most females (truly an alpha female character with men whether significant or otherwise with my hidden docile side) so because I have a high level of self-esteem, courage, secure, not clingy, and definitely don't need my mans attention 24-7 I was able to handle this man. Why you ask did I get involved with someone like this? Well for the same reason that he didn't want a clingy insecure female taking him away from his sports and his time with the guys during sports. I valued my time to myself just as much as I put value in to what I already knew about him. I know what your next question is, why didn't we work out then? Well it had nothing to do with his addiction to sports, as hard as it would be to believe. We ended things because long term we didn't want the same goals-I was looking for someone to have kids with and he point blank didn't want kids at all. Unfortunately, that wasn't discovered until about the 6th date. 

There you have it ladies and gents! Regardless though at the end of the day, if two people want to really make it work they BOTH with make it work.

Sincerely,

A Distinct Woman 

Tuesday, 24 May 2022

Inspire Respect Not a Hard On - General

"...women should adorn themselves with proper conduct, with modesty and self control, not with braided hairstyles and gold ornaments, or pearls, or expensive clothes, but rather, as befits women who profess reverence for God, with good deeds."
1 Timothy 2: 9-10

Yes I know not the best title but I figured it would tweak enough curiosity or interest in today's world, just be forewarned that some religious tone is involved in this post. So if religious ideas, opinions, or tone isn't your thing or you don't believe in religion, this may not be the post for you. This may turn out to be a lengthy post and perhaps a controversial one at that...this isn't for the weak of mind, intellect, and open mindedness, also apologies on any crudeness used in this post. I will state that my tone isn't meant to be judgmental (because I'm not) but critical so please know the difference. I’m a passionate person altogether so don’t misconstrue my passion, for “hate” because it’s not and sometimes my words get away from me. I do feel strongly about what this post is about and should be something every women should be aware of otherwise I fear for our daughters and future women.

I won't make the mistake in generalizing every female to be a lady so I'm just going to use the term "women"; same goes for males, I won't generalize by assuming that all men are "gentlemen" or educated with etiquette of some kind, but that they are "men". This entire post applies to all ages and all scenarios as well, whether your status financially has you as a poor person or as the richest person in the world. Please also note that this post doesn't specifically callout one religion but perhaps intertwines some Christianity. 

Being a mother of two, I'm continually looking at the world with as much of an unbiased nature as I possibly can. What does that mean? Well, I will try to look at both sides of the story-the pros and cons-as well as put myself in the opposite point of view or scenario. However when it comes to modesty, dignity, and the self respect of a female I firmly believe that there's only one aspect that's correct and needed in society. I mean have you seen some of the clothes out there for little girls!?! No way in hell I would let me daughters where half of some of wardrobe out there. Don't even get me started on women who are moms and above the age of thirty-five, still trying to dress as if they're eighteen! There's just some things after a certain age you a person just shouldn't be wearing! Which reminds me...

Side note: Women PLEASE dress your age! You're getting older, get over it, gravity takes it's course and wrinkles on your face will appear as they will symbolically represent the stories behind the years. I've heard it said that the more wrinkles you have means that you must have smiled and laughed a lot in your life. If they statement were indeed true than why would you want to try and cover those face lines-the ones that display joy and happiness. Why must you bother to attempt to "look less old" when you can simply just embrace the changes, take your precautions with a natural skincare and create a new line of fashion trend for your age group. If you are over the age of twenty-five, stop dressing like your back in high school all over again! Or at least save that for the bedroom ;) for your husband (significant other). Dress appropriately for your age-I don't mean you have to be dressing like you're a grandmother in her 80s but you sure as hell don't have to be dressing like a young skank/tramp (regardless if you have the body for it)! If you're a woman who picks out clothing that DOESN'T fit you, PLEASE STOP! Society for some reason has demonstrated that it's ok to wear something that's two sizes smaller than what you should be wearing! NO IT IS NOT OK! I would hear or use to say, "just use common sense" but it seems now a days that's in extreme short supply no matter where you live...PLEASE just pay attention to what you're wearing and what it provokes or represents, because whether you know it or not someone is watching you; somewhere or someone believes you to be an influence, so take the time and make sure your image is a positive one...yes I know a little bit of a long squirrel comment from what I'm making this post to be about, so apologies and I shall digress on this...

So let me ask you women, are you tugging at your dress conscientious that it might start revealing your ass or that when you get up from sitting down you have to pull down your dress some because you feel the dress is sticking to your ass because of how short it is? What about your skirts or shorts? Are you doing the same thing to those two clothing items all the time as well? Or lets talk about your tops; are you a well attributed busty woman and purposely choose tops that you'll continue to be pulling up, whether its your tank top/V-neck/scoop neck. I understand that some woman are bustier than others and that it might require a certain clothing alteration in general-if you are one of those bustier women, I can comprehend your dilemma and your aren't the ones targeted in this post, however make sure that you don't use your bust as an excuse to almost have your breast hanging out of your top...if you answered yes to ANY or ALL of what I just said then this post is most definitely for you! I understand and comprehend that every female has different body builds and physiques and that the shape of their body dictates the type of clothing used or bought. So the biggest question is, do you pick and/or buy your clothing with modesty of dress and self dignity as well as self worth, in mind?

I'm truly baffled in seeing how many young females or little girls from the ages of 14 and under, are basically dressing up like little hoes/sluts. What's worse is that the mother is aware and lets them leave the their homes dressed that way or worse is the one purchasing the clothing for them! I know what's being sold at the department stores for this age group doesn't help, but that shouldn't be used as an excuse or a scapegoat. Here's an example; I go to Mass every Sunday and my mentally is that, "oh we're in a place of worship and reverence so inappropriate dress should be of no concern." Sadly that's where sometimes I see the most females (both young and old) in the skimpiest of outfits. What's more disconcerting in this observation is that the young females/little girls are sometimes similar or worse than their mother's who are also in turn dressed up in the skimpiest of outfits. I'm already a person who likes to observe so, I began to take note-but the repetitive cycle of observation became apparent every Sunday. Then as the seasons changed things didn't seem to improve and yes that includes even the cold weather! My observations brought me to the conclusion of,  no matter what the occasion was (mass, religious event, wedding, formal event, prom, high school dance of some kind, graduation, formal gathering, concert, etc.) the spectrum of what is being tolerated and accepted now of what young ladies wear. Frankly, it all starts at home whether it being directly through the mother, a mother, or indirectly through a role model. If a respectful and modest dress code isn't implemented than it will dissipate altogether. Whoever the young females womanly influence is, then that's what they will end up gravitating towards. Yes a high school female trying to embrace her individuality as represented by her fashion is understandable BUT there's also an educational person for the adolescence; that a sense of self respect should be encouraged, taught, and enforced in their wardrobe style WHILE exploring their individuality. I'm sure that there will be conflict and disagreements, especially if modesty is currently going against the social norm of young females in mini skirts/dresses as well as showing more skin than covering it...BUT professional women don't go to work in mini skirts and low scooped cleavage outfits, unless their work is on the street corners, so then why do we allow it for everywhere else and for such young ages?...I don't even want to get into swim suits because I would be going off on a huge tangent that would probably be as long as this post has become...I mean people might as well be naked with the crappy things they call “swim suits” now a days. Which reminds me-women if you are over the age of thirty-five, why in you’re right mind are you still trying to pull off a skimpy excuse of a bathing suit that maybe a teenager or even a twenty something year old would wear?...

So moms out there, it starts with you...don't worry young women your paragraph isn't far behind...Moms, how do you define the terms hot, sexy, and attractive? Because from this point forward is how the clothes in your closet are depicted. Yes before you were a mother you were just a woman like any other with goals, ambitions, dreams, and more importantly working the dating scene. You went through the stages of favorite colors, favorite styles, favorite movies as well as books/novels, therefore leading to your self identity. By the time I graduated high school (or perhaps completed your GED or just plainly left high school altogether) I figured out what type of person I was to be which included my wardrobe statements. This is where the question I started with comes into play. If from the age of 16-25 years of age you viewed the term "hot" as basically having every males attention especially in the regard of their physical reaction and attention to you, then you've failed to comprehend an important aspect in your self worth. Actually even if you're 25-45 years of age, that's not the point of "hot". Now what about the term sexy? If you viewed or view that term as, you the female, feeling good about herself in what she's wearing but your intention is to "provide men with a hard on," then you have again failed and in this matter in regards to your self dignity. If you've viewed attractive as something mediocre to being hot or sexy or perhaps a downgrade from someone who is a hot or sexy or both, then you too have failed. Every female is attractive in their own way (as are men) so you should strive for feeling sexy and being attractive, because the true definition of those two terms should correlate to your believe of your self worth, dignity, and self respect-with nothing to do regarding how men perceive you or whether or not you are considered "hot" or not.

You see, an attractive woman is supposed to be the ideal female for men. Ok, what do I mean by that; think of the phrase that tends to come out in many romantic comedies scenarios, "You want to be the librarian and the hooker, look like a woman that can play both parts in the males fantasy." I'm sure many can view and interpret this phrase in many different aspects but the one point rings true throughout any scenario, the woman isn't dressing like a hooker or a librarian, but providing the illusion that she can play both parts! Let's break it down first by terms; "lustful" is tied into both the terms hot and sexy whereas, "appealing" is used in both sexy and attractive. Then the woman's wardrobe-just because you're attractive doesn't mean you have to be showing off half your ass outside your shorts and half your boobs either. Or since we're in the yoga pant and tight short fashion trend, just because you're wearing those tight clothing items doesn't mean for your vagina apex curvature to be outlined and visible, have a slightly longer top to cover the areas on display. Granted what you wear in the bedroom WITH and FOR YOUR husband (significant other) is your prerogative, but why then, is it ok for what only your husband (significant other) is supposed to be viewing on display for all other males or for the world to see?...being "hot" and "sexy" should be saved for our spouses (significant others), so that we continue to liven and enthrall them in the bedroom. 

This needs to be followed up and affirmed by you men! If your wife is dressing like a slut (for lack of a better term) and you let her walk outside of your bedroom or worse outside of your home, especially when you already have children, then shame on you because the fault is not entirely her own. If you as the man, are ok with your wife prompting lustful thoughts in other men because of how and what she's wearing, then you have failed as her protector, partner, spouse, and more importantly as her spiritual guide. I'm not saying that it's not rewarding to have others say "you got a great girl" or other affirming comments that you've picked one hell of a woman as your partner, but you shouldn't treat your woman as an object. Whether you know it or not, you are as just as responsible for her actions the moment she walks out of the house; Humans aren't wired to be alone and regardless of popular belief, women and men tend to derive the reasons for their actions in some way shape of form, from the opposite sex whether that's directly or indirectly. 

Modesty doesn't mean dressing like a nun, but it sure as hell doesn't mean dressing like a hooker. Whether "we" (women in general) like to admit it or not, men tend to respond better and react more profoundly in life to a woman who is assertively respectful and respected; then they focus on the aesthetics which is prompted by what "we" women wear. An example being: whether your skinny, athletically toned, muscular, fat, or obese if you're wearing a dress/skirt that hikes up your ass-et in the back and you have to keep pulling it down, then have a scoop neck/V-neck/cleavage on your said dress or top but continue to pull it up because you are self conscious of your breasts hanging out - the man will and immediately tend to think the following (whether they may mean to or not)...1)I wonder what she's wearing underneath the dress or I wonder if she's even wearing anything underneath 2)I wonder what size her boobs are or how they would feel in my hand 3)I wonder what type of bra she has on underneath that top/dress 4)She probably has some sexy lingerie on under all of that. Ok there's a lot more I could say but they really aren't worth mentioning and yes these are statements from men I've personally asked what their first thought is when they see a female dressed a certain way. You know what was more surprising women? 8 out of the 15 men I asked (who ranged from the ages of 22-42) stated that I was forgetting the type of shoes "we" wear. That sometimes our shoes alone with the "hot" or "sexy" wardrobe prompts them to lust after us then the clothing itself. Aren't those words for thought?...And these men asked were NOT male family members either, if that's beneficial in your reading to know.

Therefore, I'm brought back to the bible verse in the beginning of this post. Women were placed on this earth for great things and a powerful influence, heck sorry men but we women are incredible creatures because we are blessedly able to bring life into the world! "We" women participate in the divine life of the Holy Trinity more intimately than men can ever fathom! We are given gifts of a child/children and in turn given even more responsibilities than that of our husbands (our "Adam").  Yes, we require men for the pro-creation however our bodies are the channels/tabernacles/protection for that which is created. It's because of this great gift and responsibility that one could say that women dictate the moral conscience and arrow of society; something "we" are sadly faltering in because women can't come to terms with something as simple as modesty. So when women falter so in turn the moral compass in society falters. Just because woman gained rights doesn't mean the foundation that makes us women should be erased or re-written/changed. The importance of how a women dresses can't be emphasized enough nor can it really be OVER emphasized. Has anyone thought to ask why for the last 2, 022 years Roman Catholic Popes have repeatedly implored women to dress modestly, emphasizing that immodest dress CAN provoke and provide occasions of sin. Dressing immodestly tends to allure men into committing sin whether through temptation or provoking action, and as Christian women (whether Catholic or not) we have a moral obligation to AVOID enticing men. The point is to dress modestly attractive and NOT dressing to ATTRACT. The fact is that a woman dressing immodestly, commits sin (whether venial or mortal) and separates herself from God, depending on the degree of her immodesty.

So why then do "we" (women as a whole) allow ourselves to be objectified? "We" complain about how men treat us without respect or as objects, etc yet "we" as women also tend to forget that men are and were made to be visual creatures of God and that a woman's body language (which yes includes what she's wearing) will and shall dictate how a man will treat her. A woman who dressed with modesty, dignity, grace, and self respect will in turn be approached and treated with respect and a sense of honor. If however a woman dresses like a slut...well I'm sorry, but then you shouldn't really be complaining about how the man treated you or is treating you to begin with, because you will only be seen as a sexual object and nothing more.

All of the pictures below are different types of clothing/fashion, allowing individuality to be expressed yet still remain in a modest and fashionable trend. So think twice before you put something on and think twice before you put your daughter or buy your daughter certain clothing items...our daughters will understand more fully when they are mothers; deal with the disagreements now and be the role model and matriarch leader you were called to be the moment you were given the gift of life at conception.

Sincerely,
A Distinct Woman





Wednesday, 4 May 2022

Family and You - Family Life/Relationships

Have you ever bothered to ask someone if they’re family oriented or if they’re close to their family? It’s always interesting for me to hear their explanation and also notice when their verbal claim contradicts their actions in life. Its something interesting to find in passing with friendships but I find it extremely fascinating to observe when the answers provided are by those you’re dating/becoming seriously involved with. If you haven’t, then just broach this conversation with someone and see where it leads…

Now for the purpose of this post :) For starters are you a “Family Oriented” person or are you a person that was brought up in a “close knit family like upbringing” or are you “dedicated to family.” I know what you’re thinking, is there a difference and why so many options; probably didn’t even think that there was more than two options. In case you’re wondering what the difference is, allow me to elaborate a little by how I personally define the differences and how google defines it. Actually, we shall begin with how Google defines “close knit family” - bound together by intimate social or cultural ties or by close economic or political ties. My definition goes like this - a family that congregates (whether by blood relation or extended family) on major holidays, family as well as life emergencies, social events, and that have a close or semi close relation in communication daily or at least weekly/monthly depending on personal lives. Where there may be gaps in the timeframe of communication but you can easily just pick up where you last left off. Google defines “family oriented” as - the family that you were born into and/or someone who has their family at the heart of all that they do and all the decisions that they make. My definition goes like this - the family your born into by blood/adoption who you communicate with either once a week (as a minimum) or possibly daily as a (maximum); that you don’t just see them for major holidays and family functions/events but for every birthday/anniversary and family gathering. Google defines “dedicated to family” as - committing yourself to family and everything your family entails, where you’re meaning of life and purpose, is to surround yourself with family. My definition goes a little like this - where you main purpose and way of life is specifically surrounded around the family and all that it entails, even if it puts your own social/personal life on hold or at risk, because the individual is more committed to the family ties then to create new “family ties” of their own, outside of their family unit. 

So why, you may ask, am I even writing about this? Well, a few weeks ago (as well as about a few months back in another occurrence) there was a conversation at the dinner table amongst family members (I know the irony) about how the family unit in society today has changed from what it once was, when my uncles and parents were younger. Obviously, as the years pass so do the fads and phases of social teachings but what typically remains key to progress and adults in the world is their upbringing or the kind of exposure they have with/to their family. Pretty much up until my sister and I, some ways of life have changed amongst our family. For example, my parents and their siblings didn’t go out of their state and/or city for their college/university education per say - during their times their parents deemed that to be unnecessary regardless of the many benefits/scholarships and advantageous possibilities for their own futures; simply just unheard of in addition to life circumstances to not having the financial possibility. Well what about scholarships and student loans, you may ask, yes even regardless of two of my uncles having full rides for their academic careers there was more concern for external variables and them being away from home than their future careers. Which brings us to the example of my cousins currently, where my dad’s brother’s kids all stayed local except for one (the oldest) and my mom’s sisters children are definitely doing outside our family norm because not only are they both going out of town for their schooling, they’re staying/have stayed in the dorms along with the oldest not even living in the same state for his master’s degree; he’s literally across the nation! Another example towards the content of the conversation had at the dinner table was about dating and when you’re involved in a serious relationship. Obviously circumstantial variables play into these next few statements like single parents/parenting, perhaps you’re the caretaker of your elderly parents, etc - those are the circumstantial variables I’m referring to, which are all understandable variables as well.

If you’re dating someone yet you’re making your family more important than the person you’re trying to get serious with, then what gives that person you’re seeing the notion or hope that they will ever become just as important to you as your family. There’s a difference between being brought into someone’s circle and being hopeful that you’ll be creating a new circle with that person altogether. Yes love is not fragile, its understanding, and the many other wonderful virtues but to help nurture the “love” you have to give the person the “feeling” of appreciation with the hope their your time will soon be their time, not that they will always be put on the back burner-this applies to both male and females by the way. Please don’t try to dissect my statement as there is nothing hidden between the lines, just making observational statements. How can you expect someone to make you important in their lives if you don’t make the attempt to make them feel important in your life, or at least to be considered important in your life. Yes, open communication about things that occur with family will be appreciated and go a long way but also not jumping ship on plans you’ve made with your significant other because of family (outside of family emergencies) is a little dumb-founding and questionable. Always imagine how you would feel if the tables were turned; women tend to say when annoyed, “every time mommy calls he stops what we’re doing and we have to do what his mom needs even if it’s something simple like going to the store to pick up something. It’s not like she’s needing it at that moment!” Or I’ve heard the comments made by men, “I can appreciate and value how family oriented she is but I feel like we can’t do anything together if it’s not around her family all the time. I don’t mind it sometimes but not all the time and at every occasion, how else am I supposed to learn about her personally if it’s always in a group setting and it’s not focused undivided attention.”

I personally see myself as “an evolved family oriented” person (to my sister it’s what she likes to call “Americanized Hispanic”). I thoroughly enjoy my family when we come together and at the family/social functions however, I’m of the mindset of limitations towards how much family time is involved. Birthday’s for little ones up until the 18th birthday are nice however thereafter I’m of the mindset to ask the person what they want to do for their birthday not force a full family gathering for it, every birthday automatically. The older/elderly is a nice treat for them to still have the family gathering so obviously that’s a yes for me. I do not believe in celebrating anniversaries together as a family unless it’s those major numbers unless the couple is wanting to involve the family at their discretion. A prime example for me is Christmas and New Years, where my family is used to being together almost every day from Christmas Eve until New Year’s Day. I think that’s lovely every other year or every couple of years, but literally to do that every year - yea I don’t think I can do that or at least give me the option of New Year’s Eve without family or family plan…I think I shall digress now…

I suppose, if you are to take anything away from this post it’s about some self reflection on what type of “family” person are you?

Sincerely,
A Distinct Woman

DIY Folding Clothes - Family Life/General

Before I begin we need to have an understanding on a few things...I'm not not like you're typical coddling and "time out" ...